11-02-12

Belgian government covers up childporn rings

Vogue.jpg

Some questions about the Zandvoort childporn case
 
Why Belgian Justice has been banned the activist Marcel Vervloesem who revealed the Zandvoort case, to talk with the media, 4 years ago ?
Why Justice has banned him to travel to other countries ?
Why Justice has banned him to contact us since his provisional liberation, 2 years ago?  He is the founder of our association 'Werkgroep Morkhoven'. We are  members of the direction board of Werkgroep Morkhoven. We were working together during almost 40 years. We visited him during 2 years, every week in prison.
Why Justice has banned him to participate to all organisations fighting childabuse?
Was it the intention to criminalize him and our association ?
Was the Belgian Justice afraid that we should going on with our investigations about the childporn rings ?
Was it the intention to isolate him so that it would be easier to accuse him again in the tabloids ?
 
Justice used some new rumours in the Flemish tabloid Het Nieuwsblad and a very disputable complaint of a very disputable person to the police to take the script of Vervloesem's book about his actions and his investigations.  Why ? 
Why they used the same trick (some rumours in Het Nieuwsblad, a complaint to the police, a prosecution by Justice) ?  It is like 14 years ago when the international press (with even 3 Japanese newspapers) was interested in the Zandvoort childporn case. 
Why they used the same trick also some years ago on the moment that a lot of people had many doubts about the accusations and the long media process ?  And why they used again young people with criminal records (robberies, burglaries, exactions, thefts, vandalism, drug trafficking, involantary manslaughter by drunkenness, sexual offenses,) ?
 
Why the Belgian minister(s) of Justice and its so called independant magistrature, accepts that ? And why they accept that the Belgian constitution is violated ?
Where are the so called freedom of expression, freedom of press, the right on defense, the right to participate to associations, the right to travel, the principle that you are innocent until proven guilty, impartial and
independant juriprudence, the right to be judges on complete files without disappearances or thefts, which is (was) guaranteed by the Belgian constitution ?
Why the Flemish tabloid Het Nieuwsblad which started the mediacampaign against Marcel Vervloesem in 1998 with a false rumour of Vervloesem's disputable half-brother Victor, silenced the Zandvoort childporn case during all that time ?
Why this tabloid, that seems to have a special relation with the Justice of Turnhout, was spreading also the false rumour that Marcel was no longer member of the direction board of our association while we can even not longer organize general meetings with all the members of the direction board and are thus unable to take important decisions ?
Why Justice does never investigate seriously the rumours, complaints, declarations of witnesses, incorrect accusations in Het Nieuwsblad and to the police ?
Why Justice says now that Marcel Vervloesem was 'violating the conditions of his provisional liberation' while his judicial assistent and his supervisor, the well-known professor Cosyns, were 'very satisfied' about that ?
Why does Justice not investigate the complaint of Vervloesem's daughter about the threatening (taperecorded) of his 14 years old granddaughter by the accuser ?
Why we hear nothing about the 14-year-old girlfriend of the nearly 18-year-old accuser who was found drowned
in the pond of the court of Turnhout after she had inhaled too much gas of a lighter ?
 
Was the mediacampaign against Vervloesem and the silencing of the Zandvoort case which gives us a lot of information about the recent childabuse case in Amsterdam, a cover up operation ?
During our investigations, Georges Zicot, the disputable inspector in the Dutroux case, was giving false information about a well-known Youth Judge in France who we found back in the Zandvoort childporn case. What is the relation between the Zandvoort case and the Dutroux case ? Was the Dutroux case with the unexplained deaths of almost 30 witnesses, also a cover up operation ?
 
The Belgian government always denied the existance of an international childporn network like the Zandvoort case. Was it the intention to protect the international child porn network centralized in Brussels ?
It is possible that Belgium, center of Europe, is also a center of the international organized mafia, including child- and women trade ?
I heard today that Belgian Justice found a 'new track' to the so called gang of Brabant whereby 20 people were murdered. It is the 43th time during the last 20 years that Belgian Justice is talking about a 'new track' in this
case.  Who can take this serious ?  Why they are talking about  it and are they giving false hope, every time that there a lot of questions about the credibility of Belgian Justice ?
 
It is clear that the Belgian church is playing a important role in cases of sexual abuse. But I am wondering that the tabloids were organizing during several months a media campaign about the scandals within the Belgian church while they organized during 14 years a media campaign to cover up the Zandvoort childporn case (90.000 victims, even babies).
 
Jan Boeykens
President of Werkgroep Morkhoven
Faiderstraat 10
1060 Brussels
(Belgium)
------------
 
You can visit 'Werkgroep Morkhoven' on Facebook if the group will not be closed again by Facebook.
 
Write to Marcel Vervloesem who is seriously ill (cancer, heart, kidneys, diabetes) and was tortured during 2 years in prison: Gevangenis Turnhout, tav Marcel Vervloesem, Cel 139, Wezenstraat 1, 2300 Turnhout (Belgium)
 
Protest to the Belgian minister of Justice Annemie Turtelboom (liberals) annemie.turtelboom@just.fgov.be 
Minister of Justice, Annemie Turtelboom, Boulevard de Waterloo 115, 1000 Bruxelles (Belgium)
Téléphone : (0031) 0 2 542 80 11 - Fax : 02 542 80 00    The minister says that she will ban 'every form of partiality of the magistrature'.
 

08-09-10

Zandvoort/Dutroux: high finance

 

dutroux.insurance.companies.gifThe secret of interests feeding paedocriminal networks and the incredible censorship on the Dohy file.

Jacqueline de Croÿ - 7 septembre 2010

The good relationship between justice and poly-criminal networks has grown from the car trafficking. Insurance companies pay between 750 and 1,250 euros in cash, for information that allows the police to find stolen vehicles. The amount offered varies depending on whether the vehicle is found within the month of theft, the date by which the insurer is required to indemnify the insured. If the car is found later, the insurer becomes the owner of a decommissioned vehicle, which can only be sold for an amount inferior than the indemnity paid.

Insurance companies request from the police the guarantee that the informant is not involved in the robbery and the thieves are arrested or about to be. However, the best informants are the worst paedocriminals, who see nothing wrong in selling a child to prostitution, thus even less wrong in denouncing a friend for the price of a pass. Their rare perversity is thus precious to the insurance companies. The judges and police officers who are only interested in the results that gives advance to their carriers, do not hesitate implementing the judicial sabotages necessary to avoid prison to the best informants, thus the worse criminals.

The example of the police protection reserved for paedocriminal informants is given by Marc Dutroux, at the time he was under the effect of a 13.5 years prison sentence for having kidnapped and raped five girls while they where filmed. The police have protected him from a complaint of indecent assault on three young girls on the seventh month of his parole. The Chief Commissioner of the Charleroi police gave him permission to hold a firearm for defence, after the police had discovered an unregistered.22 Long Rifle at his home. He was left free when reported for having offered 150,000-FB (3.719-€) to the step-brother of one of his neighbours to abduct children he planed to lock in a dungeon he made in his cellar, while waiting to export them. The police did not check the information of another neighbour, who testified she had seen a kidnapped little girl at his doorstep. He has been left free to kidnap fifteen young girls to make films of rape and murdered of four of them until he recurred over the daughter of a gendarme. The informers have all the rights, except harming a police officer or his family. He was arrested.

The dossier shows another paedocriminal informant at the service of the same "stolen car" squad of Dutroux, but about whom the press has completely censored the information. George Dohy, a showman living in Mettet, convicted of the rape of a child in 1977 and for pimping in 1980, was left free to sexually assault his daughter and to rape two other young girls, in capacity of informant for Inspector Zicot since 1985. The police classified five official reports on Dohy in a so-called "internal dossier" between 1987 and 1989. One of these complaints concerned the rape of a 16-years-old girl.

The daughter of Dohy filed a complaint charging her farther of an attempted rape during her minority and one of her friends has charged him of rape in 1991. Both dossiers were relocated from the Court of Namur to that of Charleroi. The procedure required from the instructing judge Victorian Sohet to forward the duty of enquiry to Chief Commissioner, who in his turn, had to entrust it to the sex crime unit. Judge Sohet had the originality to entrust the enquiry to Zicot, employed by the stolen car unit. Zicot forged two official reports, showing a witness a "consensual sexual relationship", whereas neither the plaintiffs nor the accused had ever cited this person in the enquiry. Dohy was released of both complaints due to "absence of charges", without that judge Sohet notes the absence of the duties of enquiry he had requested from Zicot.

Four years later, Dohy was struck by a bullet in the leg, followed by a bullet in the jaw which had pierced his neck, after a disagreement with a car dealer, according to his family. This is the risk to deal with a criminal network and then to betray it. The case was assigned to the investigating magistrate Jean-Pierre Marotte, famous for having said to Philippe Deleuze, in mourning for his 16-years-old daughter that she had committed suicide, that he could be suspected of having moved the body, and he would have charged him for "concealment of a corpse" if he had the legal possibility to do so.

Judge Marotte came to the conclusion in less than 48 hours, that the author of the assassination attempt on Dohy was not the car dealer, but those who could testify of Zicot's methods. Marotte has jailed the wife, the sister and the nephew of Dohy, as well as a young man who has admitted having given false testimony by fear of Dohy, thus under threat. Dohy has survived his wounds against all odds, and has himself testified that he had never spoken to Zicot about this "witness" in the rape case. Marotte's accused were convicted in March 1998 as partners in crime for the attempt of murder, which means absolutely nothing to Belgium, where anyone can be convicted of anything, despite evidence of innocence and consent of false accusations.

The information arrived at the magistrate in the Dutroux case, through the testimony of the son of Dohy concerning a car case charging Zicot, during which the rape case was mentioned. Zicot was then indicted for concealment of a truck stolen by Dutroux. Both cases of impunity granted to paedocriminals in relation to the same police unit have been attached in one. The dossier was then split into a multitude of dossiers to conceal the responsibility of the magistrates and police officers.

The Dohy case has strangely landed in the prosecution exclusively reserved to stolen vehicles, to deal exclusively with the forgeries of Zicot on the rapes of the young girls. The dossier has not been submitted to the parliamentary commission supposed to establish what was then described as "dysfunctions". Zicot just had to plead the responsibility of the magistrates. Judge Sohet just had to acknowledged about the violation of procedures regarding the assignment of investigative duties "that it was possible and, moreover, not uncommon insofar as the contacts are daily between prosecutors and judicial police."

Judge Desmette has cleared Zicot from the forgery in writing that freed his informant. The bullets in Dohy’s leg and jaw, which would have resulted from fear of his family, thus from the denial of justice in cases of violence and rapes, would not have caused the harm required to sentence a forgery. Ironically, inspector Zicot has only been convicted for defrauding the VAT!

The figures given by the insurance company Royale Belge during the trial have revealed that it was recovering an average of 50.000 € a year in stolen vehicles, for 1,660-€ in bonuses for denunciations. The judges have thus covered-up the kidnapping and filmed rapes of sixteen young girls and the murder of four of them by Dutroux, along with the rape of two young girls by Dohy and the attempted rape on his daughter to save the insurance companies from these ridiculous sums.

The so-called "Dutroux bis" case, which contained only a few dozen sheets, according to the newspaper Libre Belgique, concerned the membership of the criminal gang to a paedophile network. A few dozen pages that have been separated from the 400.000 pages of the original case, in reason of their connexion with numerous parliamentary questions on the identical judicial sabotage in the Antwerp area, which the NGO Morkhoven was exposing since 1988.

Morkhoven has shown the goodwill of the network Zandvoort in 1998, with 90,000 pictures of child pornography, which justice has closed in secret in a few weeks due to "unknown perpetrators". It is irresistible to note that inspector Zicot has found a similarity between a pimp of Lodelinsart and the photograph of a French magistrate, trousers down with an 11-years-old boy, which the Zandvoort network was selling on Internet.

Morkhoven has also shown in 2001, the existence of an employment contract between the wife of Nihoul and a supplier of the Zandvoort network, as well as a testimony showing that Dutroux was going to the studios producing sadomasochist films of the same supplier. The case was dismissed a second time in secret at an undetermined date, then a third time by the sentencing to death of the key witness through illegal imprisonment in 2009, then a fourth time by lack of charges in 2010.

The Zandvoort dossier also included a list of hundreds of license plates numbers, which assumes a makeup service for stolen vehicles. The making-up of vehicles consists in retyping them new chassis number, making them false documents and giving them a new plate numbers. A proper investigation on this list of license plates numbers could have traced hundreds of stolen vehicles, but the judges have not even opened the dossier, because they thought it only contained child pornography.

These judges thus carry on to grant police protection to paedocriminals whose network provides a makeup service for stolen vehicles. Even better: the insurance companies carry on paying bonuses to these paedocriminals to drop some of these cars, which allow the network to sell the other cars... under police protection!

Still at this day in Belgium, the police in Herentals employs one of these "informants", subject to over thirty official reports classified in an "internal file", which exposes him for sexual abuse of minors, drug trafficking and perjury. This informant broke the neck of an architect a few months ago, a case which the court of Turnhout will undoubtedly close for "lack of element".

http://www.droitfondamental.eu/001-zandvoort-Dutroux__haute_finance___en.htm

 




 

15:50 Gepost door Werkgroep Morkhoven in Child abuse, Dutroux case | Permalink | Commentaren (1) | Tags: dutroux, zandvoort, insurance companies |  Facebook |